With the interest on here looking at naked bikes like the Tuono and S1000R, I'm reposting a write up of my search for happiness after I wadded up my S1000RR.
I did test rides back to back on the Monster 1200 R and the BMW S1000R.


Two bikes with as many differences as similarities. After owning an S1000RR for the past couple of years, the S1000R seemed very similar. The sounds, the gearbox/quick-shifter, throttle response, controls all felt all too familiar. The demo bike was still rev limited at 9K rpm but the BMW R model is just about done at that point anyway. It seemed to handle lighter with a more flickable tip in than my RR and it pulled a bit harder in the mid-range but not enough of a difference to change how I'd ride it on the street. It's basically the same bike with up-right ergos and missing that heart-attack rush on the top end of the S1000RR. Not that that's bad - on the street anyway. My horoscope told me that 14,000 rpm romps on the street will eventually end at the gray bar hotel. The '16 R feels just like my '13 S1000RR with no shift assist pro and it still has that fugly cat can under the exhaust on it. My final thought on it is that maybe the R is the bike I should have originally bought over the RR but now after having owned the RR, the S1000R really doesn't excite me.
Jumping on the Monster R, the first thing I noticed was that it seemed like a smaller and lighter bike just sitting on it. The bars and pegs fell in very comfortable spots for me but still felt like they would work for an athletic ride. I'd cranked it before throwing my leg over it so the next thing I noticed was that the TFT display seemed not as bright as I would have preferred and it seemed to me that glare would sometimes be an issue. I didn't spend any time fussing with it and set off.
On the roll, it was very obvious to me that I was riding a high compression twin and it seemed like I could feel every combustion stroke resonate through me. When I pulled away from the first light and jumped on the throttle, I gave me the kind of woody that only an Italian machine can evoke. Fraaack, this thing pulls HARD from way down in the revs and had me laughing inside my hat within the first half-mile. I loved the sounds coming from this bike but without the wail I'm used to, I looked down and was surprised to see that I was more than double the limit on this winding industrial park road. The handling was much lighter than the BMW. It tipped in and went knee to knee like a 600. It was a short ride so I didn't get comfortable enough to test the brakes or push it (and I wasn't ready to own a bashed up Monster R) but I can really see why Ducati is saying that this is the most track day ready Monster they've built to date. Why in the world would they leave the quick-shifter off this bike? IMO, that's the biggest deficit with a bike this track ready.
For my kind of riding on the street, the Monster R seems like an avalanche of usable power compared to the BMW that, even on the R model, needs some coals thrown at it to stretch your arms.
Now my problem is that the Monster R is way more spendy than the other bikes on my list. Like $5K more. I haven't really started to negotiate yet but I'm getting quoted over $21K out the door. KTM and BMW are discounting and throwing in extras and the Speed Triple R is just a lot cheaper to begin with. The Ducati is molto sexy but also molto costoso.
I'm going tomorrow to ride a new 2015 Super Duke 1290 R that is deeply discounted and they are throwing in an Akrapovic exhaust for no additional money. More power, less weight, shorter wheelbase, and less money. Hmmmm.....
I did test rides back to back on the Monster 1200 R and the BMW S1000R.


Two bikes with as many differences as similarities. After owning an S1000RR for the past couple of years, the S1000R seemed very similar. The sounds, the gearbox/quick-shifter, throttle response, controls all felt all too familiar. The demo bike was still rev limited at 9K rpm but the BMW R model is just about done at that point anyway. It seemed to handle lighter with a more flickable tip in than my RR and it pulled a bit harder in the mid-range but not enough of a difference to change how I'd ride it on the street. It's basically the same bike with up-right ergos and missing that heart-attack rush on the top end of the S1000RR. Not that that's bad - on the street anyway. My horoscope told me that 14,000 rpm romps on the street will eventually end at the gray bar hotel. The '16 R feels just like my '13 S1000RR with no shift assist pro and it still has that fugly cat can under the exhaust on it. My final thought on it is that maybe the R is the bike I should have originally bought over the RR but now after having owned the RR, the S1000R really doesn't excite me.
Jumping on the Monster R, the first thing I noticed was that it seemed like a smaller and lighter bike just sitting on it. The bars and pegs fell in very comfortable spots for me but still felt like they would work for an athletic ride. I'd cranked it before throwing my leg over it so the next thing I noticed was that the TFT display seemed not as bright as I would have preferred and it seemed to me that glare would sometimes be an issue. I didn't spend any time fussing with it and set off.
On the roll, it was very obvious to me that I was riding a high compression twin and it seemed like I could feel every combustion stroke resonate through me. When I pulled away from the first light and jumped on the throttle, I gave me the kind of woody that only an Italian machine can evoke. Fraaack, this thing pulls HARD from way down in the revs and had me laughing inside my hat within the first half-mile. I loved the sounds coming from this bike but without the wail I'm used to, I looked down and was surprised to see that I was more than double the limit on this winding industrial park road. The handling was much lighter than the BMW. It tipped in and went knee to knee like a 600. It was a short ride so I didn't get comfortable enough to test the brakes or push it (and I wasn't ready to own a bashed up Monster R) but I can really see why Ducati is saying that this is the most track day ready Monster they've built to date. Why in the world would they leave the quick-shifter off this bike? IMO, that's the biggest deficit with a bike this track ready.
For my kind of riding on the street, the Monster R seems like an avalanche of usable power compared to the BMW that, even on the R model, needs some coals thrown at it to stretch your arms.
Now my problem is that the Monster R is way more spendy than the other bikes on my list. Like $5K more. I haven't really started to negotiate yet but I'm getting quoted over $21K out the door. KTM and BMW are discounting and throwing in extras and the Speed Triple R is just a lot cheaper to begin with. The Ducati is molto sexy but also molto costoso.
I'm going tomorrow to ride a new 2015 Super Duke 1290 R that is deeply discounted and they are throwing in an Akrapovic exhaust for no additional money. More power, less weight, shorter wheelbase, and less money. Hmmmm.....








Comment