Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Bicycling Thread

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    I can regularly out-coast me riding partners. My bike is titanium, but about the same weight as my friends' bikes. There's no explaining it except for one thing - my Ultegra rim brakes don't have any drag at all. My friends' fancy bikes all have discs. I suspect that even a small, almost undetectable disc drag might be enough to account for what is a pretty significant difference at the end of a moderate 1/2 mile downhill.

    Comment


    • wildbears
      wildbears commented
      Editing a comment
      Add increased wind resistance with disc brakes?

    • 955i
      955i commented
      Editing a comment
      Hadn't thought of that. Perhaps. What do they say about "incremental gains?"

    • wildbears
      wildbears commented
      Editing a comment
      • At High Speeds (45–55+ km/h / ~28–34+ mph): Wind-tunnel tests (such as those by Quintana Roo) show that rim brakes can have an aerodynamic advantage of roughly 3 to 7 watts.
      • At Realistic Speeds (25–35 km/h / ~16–22 mph): The difference shrinks dramatically to just 1 to 1.5 watts, which is negligible for most everyday and recreational riders.
      So coasting downhill at 30 to 40 mph, rim brakes would give you an advantage. Even more at higher speeds.
      https://quintanarootri.com/blogs/new...riathlon-bikes

      Overall, the rider presents the biggest aerodynamic factor. How you sit on the bike can make a big difference, obviously.

      My own tests of rolling distance while coasting indicate that even the slightest wind can make a significant measurable difference.
      Last edited by wildbears; 2 weeks ago.

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2026-10-17 9.41.47 AM.png
Views:	1
Size:	591.3 KB
ID:	70729

    Comment




      Ultegra VS Dura-Ace???

      Comment


      • 955i
        955i commented
        Editing a comment
        105 !!!!!!!

      Click image for larger version

Name:	Screenshot 2026-10-22 4.31.13 PM.png
Views:	1
Size:	755.0 KB
ID:	70780

      Comment


        Click image for larger version

Name:	Van Gogh, Cycling.png
Views:	1
Size:	786.4 KB
ID:	70802

        Comment


          Bears, I have been busy and traveling a lot lately. We have done some more coasting tests among friends. I will talk about it when I get a chance in a few days.

          Comment


            IMPORTANT UPDATE

            Originally posted by wildbears View Post
            Target Fixation and Flashing Bike Lights

            "A flashing light on a target typically increases rather than reduces target fixation. Because flashing lights are designed to be highly visible and eye-catching, they naturally lock human attention, frequently causing distracted or panicked individuals to stare directly at the hazard."
            FLASHING VERSUS STEADY LIGHTING AND WHY YOU SHOULD USE BOTH!

            A flashing light is significantly worse for triggering target fixation than a steady light. BUT....
            While both types of light can draw a person’s gaze, flashing or blinking lights pose a much higher risk for a few key neurological and behavioral reasons:

            Why Flashing Lights Are Worse
            • Disrupts Depth Perception: A flashing light makes it incredibly difficult for an approaching driver or rider to accurately judge distance and closing speed. Because the visual stimulus keeps disappearing and reappearing, the brain struggles to calculate exactly how fast it is approaching the target.
            • The "Moth-to-Flame" Effect: Blinking lights naturally command a higher level of involuntary visual attention. Under stress, fatigue, or intoxication, a driver's brain can experience highway hypnosis. They unconsciously lock onto the flashing hazard, and because the human body naturally steers where the eyes are looking, they drift straight toward the light.
            • Longer Eye Fixation: Studies tracked by the National Surface Transportation Safety Center for Excellence have shown that flashing hazard lights cause longer durations of eye fixation. This increases the likelihood that a distracted or tired driver will inadvertently steer out of their lane and strike a roadside vehicle or cyclist.
            The Safety Trade-off

            This creates a classic safety paradox:
            • Flashing lights are much better at confronting a driver and getting them to notice an object from a long distance.
            • Steady lights are much better at helping a driver navigate around that object safely once they know it is there.
            Because of this, many safety agencies and experienced night commuters recommend a hybrid approach if possible—such as cyclists using one flashing light to grab attention and one steady light to provide a fixed point for distance tracking.

            If you are looking to optimize a specific lighting setup or manage driving risks, let me know:
            • Are you looking at this from the perspective of a cyclist/motorcyclist setting up your own gear?
            • Is this regarding emergency/roadside vehicle safety?
            • Are you trying to train yourself on how to break target fixation while driving or riding?
            REFERENCES:







            Comment

            Working...
            X